GCNA-GCA management amalgamation had resulted in administrative savings of $0.5 mill. Some persons who had been paying attention had noted that the GCNA appeared to be without a Manager for an extended period and were advised by persons who should be “in the know” that the GCA Manager was “keeping an eye on things”. Why was there this “mystery” about what should be a straight-forward explanation? Were the farmers advised that this was a policy decision on the part of both Boards?
